Comparison of Students’ and Teachers' Perceptions of the Psychosocial Learning Environment in Mathematics Classrooms

Authors

  • Dr. Nishat Zafar Associate Lecturer, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Mobeen Ul Islam Assistant Professor, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Laraib Research Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.2025.44162

Keywords:

Psychosocial Learning Environment, Mathematics Classroom, Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, WIHIC, Classroom Climate, Secondary Education

Abstract

The research paper has investigated the perceptions of Grade 10 students and mathematics teachers with the psychosocial learning environment in mathematics classrooms and contrasted the two data sets to find instances of convergences and divergences. A quantitative, descriptive-comparative research design was adopted whereby 2,400 students and 120 mathematics instructors in 12 public secondary schools in District Gujranwala in Pakistan were used. The adapted version of the What Is Happening in This Class? was used to collect the data. Questionnaire: (WIHIC) measured six dimensions: Student Cohesiveness, Teacher Support, Involvement, Task Orientation, Cooperation and Equity. Results obtained have showed that students and teachers have a positive perception of the classroom environment in all dimensions, with teachers having a higher perception in all dimensions especially the Teacher Support, Involvement and Equity. Although students reported moderate engagement, other areas like student involvement and perceived equity showed that there were slight discrepancies in how teachers intended to do something, and how students experienced it. The research points to the relevance of integrating classroom practice with the students’ views, reinforcing the active learning strategies, as well as a supportive and equitable psychosocial environment, to improve the engagement and student performance in mathematics.

Author Biography

  • Laraib, Research Scholar, Department of Education, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Punjab, Pakistan.

    Corresponding Author: [email protected]

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic press.

Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T.-C. I. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679909597628

Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2000). A cross-cultural study of classroom learning environments in Australia and Taiwan. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 101–134.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning policy institute.

Den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School effectiveness and school improvement, 15(3-4), 407-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450512331383262

Den Brok, P., Levy, J., Brekelmans, M., & Wubbels, T. (2005). The effect of teacher interpersonal behaviour on students' subject-specific motivation. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 20-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23870661

Edwards, D. B., Jr, Okitsu, T., da Costa, R., & Kitamura, Y. (2017). Regaining legitimacy in the context of global governance? UNESCO, Education for All coordination and the Global Monitoring Report. International Review of Education, 63(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9646-1

Fraser, B. (2014). Classroom learning environments. In Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 1-4). Springer, Dordrecht.

Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning environments research, 1(1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009932514731

Fraser, B. J. (2011). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. Second international handbook of science education, 1191-1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_79

Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1983). Use of actual and preferred Classroom Environment Scales in person–environment fit research. Journal of educational Psychology, 75(2), 303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.2.303

Fraser, B. J., & Goh, S. C. (2003). Classroom learning environments. In International Handbook of Educational Research in the Asia-Pacific Region: Part One (pp. 463-475). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

Fraser, B. J., Aldridge, J. M., & Adolphe, F. G. (2010). A cross-national study of secondary science classroom environments in Australia and Indonesia. Research in Science Education, 40(4), 551-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9133-1

Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Fisher, D. (1996, August). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment questionnaire. In Proceedings Western Australian Institute for educational research forum (Vol. 31).

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Merrill/Pearson.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. International Educational and Professional.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1987). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583

Lewin, K. (2013). Principles of topological psychology. Read Books Ltd.

Miele, D. (2009). Handbook of motivation at school (Vol. 704). K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Moos, R. H. (1979). Evaluating Educational Environments: Procedures, Measures, Findings and Policy Implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

OECD. (2019). An OECD learning framework 2030. In The future of education and labor (pp. 23-35). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Patrick, B. C., Hisley, J., & Kempler, T. (2000). “What's everybody so excited about?”: The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality. The Journal of Experimental Education, 68(3), 217-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970009600093

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493-529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68

Trickett, E. J., & Moos, R. H. (1995). Classroom environment scale manual: Development, applications, research. Consulting Psychologists Press.

Wubbels, T., & Brekelmans, M. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1-2), 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.003

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zafar, N., Islam, M. U., & Laraib. (2025). Comparison of Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Psychosocial Learning Environment in Mathematics Classrooms. Regional Lens, 4(4), 305-315. https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.2025.44162