Father-son Attachment and Familial Dynamics: A Psychoanalytic Study of Bret Easton Ellis's Lunar Park
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/rl.2025.44125Keywords:
Attachement Theory, Lunar Park, Bret, Familial Dynamics, Insecure AttachmentsAbstract
This study examines the application of Attachment Theory to Bret Easton Ellis’ novel Lunar Park (2005). It studies how early emotional connections in infancy with parental figures shape the protagonist's emotional development, relational patterns, and sense of self. Using John Bowlby's theoretical framework, which argues that early caregiver relationships form the foundation of later interpersonal relationship patterns, this study argues that Ellis is the product of emotionally distant parents, especially of his domineering father. The failure in emotional availability leaves psychological effects on his persona. Ellis fictionalises himself as Bret Easton Ellis, whose dominating and critical father generates a sense of inadequacy in him. This unhealthy paternal bond manifests in Ellis’ adult life as detachment, mistrust and emotional instability. These traits later impair his marriage and his relationship with his son. The novel thus reveals how inadequate paternal attachment perpetuates cycles of emotional malfunction across generations. By reading these texts through the lens of Attachment Theory, this study reveals that the protagonist's emotional alienation is psychological prints formed within early familial settings. Ellis depicts the long-lasting consequences of insecure attachment that later affect his relationships in adulthood.
References
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.
Ellis, B. E. (2005). Lunar Park. Alfred A. Knopf.
Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment styles and personality disorders: Their connections to each other and to parental divorce, parental death, and perceptions of parental caregiving. Journal of Personality, 66(5), 835–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00034
Bowlby, J. (1991). Ethological light on psychoanalytical problems. In P. Bateson (Ed.), The development and integration of behavior (pp. 301–313). Cambridge University Press.
Fearon, R. P., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Attachment theory: Progress and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.002
McNierney, J. (2016). The Brontë Attachment Novels: An Examination of the Development of Proto-attachment Narratives in the Nineteenth Century. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
Mikulincer, M., & Horesh-Reinman, N. (1999). Adult attachment style and the perception of others: The role of projective mechanisms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 1022–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.1022
Mumme, J. M. (2013, April 15). “I’m not lost anymore:” Hyperreal self-realization amidst hostile father-son relationships in Lunar Park (Capstone paper). Cedarville University
Nielsen, H. S. (2011). What’s in a name: Double exposures in Lunar Park. In T. Dinning & B.Oprisko (Eds.), Bret Easton Ellis: American Psycho, Glamorama, Lunar Park (pp. 129 -142). Continuum International Publishing Group.
Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., & Montgomery, N. (2013). Parent and child traits associated with overparenting. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(6), 569–595. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2013.32.6.569
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., Eller, J., & Paetzold, R. L. (2020). Major principles of attachment theory. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 222-239.
Young, E., & Caveney, G. (1993). Shopping in space: Essays on America’s blank-generation fiction. Atlantic Monthly Press

